<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Authority Web Directories</title>
	<link>http://www.bestinternetresource.info/birblog/2007/06/17/authority-web-directories/</link>
	<description>Get The Best Internet Resources Here!</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: John Rang</title>
		<link>http://www.bestinternetresource.info/birblog/2007/06/17/authority-web-directories/#comment-1705</link>
		<author>John Rang</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bestinternetresource.info/birblog/2007/06/17/authority-web-directories/#comment-1705</guid>
		<description>Yes Peter - You are right. Romow along with a host of others like " gii.in " "umdum" "elib" etc. is certainly joining directories with sitelinks. 

I am updating my list of directories with sitelinks--and it seems there are quite a lot. I'll write a new post rather than updating this list on directories with sitelinks.

Regards
John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Peter - You are right. Romow along with a host of others like &#8221; gii.in &#8221; &#8220;umdum&#8221; &#8220;elib&#8221; etc. is certainly joining directories with sitelinks. </p>
<p>I am updating my list of directories with sitelinks&#8211;and it seems there are quite a lot. I&#8217;ll write a new post rather than updating this list on directories with sitelinks.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romow.com</title>
		<link>http://www.bestinternetresource.info/birblog/2007/06/17/authority-web-directories/#comment-1704</link>
		<author>Romow.com</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bestinternetresource.info/birblog/2007/06/17/authority-web-directories/#comment-1704</guid>
		<description>Looks like Romow.com is joining the sitelink club.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Romow.com is joining the sitelink club.  <img src='http://www.bestinternetresource.info/birblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Rang</title>
		<link>http://www.bestinternetresource.info/birblog/2007/06/17/authority-web-directories/#comment-1680</link>
		<author>John Rang</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 10:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bestinternetresource.info/birblog/2007/06/17/authority-web-directories/#comment-1680</guid>
		<description>Hi Dito -
Thanks for your comment. Actually, I also find your comment amusing when you call those extra links as "deep links" whereas officially they are called "site-links" on Google webmaster central. 

On calling these sites with "site-links" as authority sites - please do a little bit of research on what is known as "Authority-Score" and what is known as Hub-Score". :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dito -<br />
Thanks for your comment. Actually, I also find your comment amusing when you call those extra links as &#8220;deep links&#8221; whereas officially they are called &#8220;site-links&#8221; on Google webmaster central. </p>
<p>On calling these sites with &#8220;site-links&#8221; as authority sites - please do a little bit of research on what is known as &#8220;Authority-Score&#8221; and what is known as Hub-Score&#8221;. <img src='http://www.bestinternetresource.info/birblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dito</title>
		<link>http://www.bestinternetresource.info/birblog/2007/06/17/authority-web-directories/#comment-1666</link>
		<author>Dito</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bestinternetresource.info/birblog/2007/06/17/authority-web-directories/#comment-1666</guid>
		<description>The term for those "deep links" in the SERP is "Snippet"....not "Authority Sites"

I found this post amusing considering the lack of basic knowledge on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The term for those &#8220;deep links&#8221; in the SERP is &#8220;Snippet&#8221;&#8230;.not &#8220;Authority Sites&#8221;</p>
<p>I found this post amusing considering the lack of basic knowledge on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Chin</title>
		<link>http://www.bestinternetresource.info/birblog/2007/06/17/authority-web-directories/#comment-1604</link>
		<author>The Chin</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bestinternetresource.info/birblog/2007/06/17/authority-web-directories/#comment-1604</guid>
		<description>How can DMOZ be considered an authority directory when it never seems to be updated?

Inclusion in DMOZ is nearly impossible for new sites with unique content, but scrapper sites owned by the volunteer editors get listed quickly.

DMOZ is not an authority on anything these days,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can DMOZ be considered an authority directory when it never seems to be updated?</p>
<p>Inclusion in DMOZ is nearly impossible for new sites with unique content, but scrapper sites owned by the volunteer editors get listed quickly.</p>
<p>DMOZ is not an authority on anything these days,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
